Each trademark registration journey involves several crucial stages, one of which is the publication of the mark in the Trademark Journal. This step allows for a four-month period during which third parties can oppose the mark in a process termed as Trademark Opposition.

For brand owners to secure their trademark registration, it is of utmost importance to be aware of valid grounds for an opposition. The Trademark Registration process is intended to be fair and the opposition phase ensures that no single entity can monopolize a mark that is generic, deceptive, or confusingly similar to an existing mark. An effective Trademark Opposition will prevent the applicant from securing rights in the contested mark, protecting both the integrity of the trademark registry and consumer interests. This is vital step in maintaining a fair marketplace and is a key feature of the Trademark Registration process.

Grounds for Trademark Opposition

$C:\Users\lenovo\Desktop\13-11-2025\KEY TOOLS & AUTOMATION IN COMPLIANCE.jpg$

The Trade Marks Act, 1999, states the grounds on which a Trademark Opposition can be filed. These are broadly categorized under absolute and relative grounds for refusal.

Absolute Grounds (Section 9): These pertain to the inherent attributes of the mark itself. A mark can be opposed if it is non-distinctive, is descriptive of the quality or origin of the goods or has become customary in the trade, is deceptive, or hurts religious sentiments. A successful Trademark Registration requires the mark to overcome all of those hurdles.
Relative Grounds (Section 11): These grounds pertain to the mark's conflict with prior, existing trademarks. If the new mark is directly the same, or confusingly similar to a prior mark for similar goods or services, there may be grounds for an objection in order to protect against public confusion. This is a common ground for opposition in trademark.

Similar or Identical Marks

One of the most common grounds for an opposition in Trademark is that the proposed mark is identical or deceptively similar to an existing registered mark. The resemblance can be:

Visual: the logos or stylized texts lookalike.
Phonetic: The marks sound similar when spoken.
Conceptual: The marks share the same idea or meaning.

The essential test is whether the similarity will likely confuse consumers into thinking the new mark is associate with the older established mark. Successfully proving this is a key to block a new Trademark Registration.

Descriptive or Misleading Marks

A trade mark has to be distinctive and not merely descriptive. A mark may be the subject of an opposition if it consists solely of words that describe the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, or geographical origin of the goods or services. For example, attempting the Trademark Registration of "Tasty Burger" for a burger restaurant would likely to be denied because it is purely descriptive. A trademark opposition may also be based on marks that are misleading or deceptive to the public.

Prior Use or Existing Reputation

The "first in the market, first in law" principle is fundamental. An earlier user of a trade mark, even without a Trademark Registration has a superior claim over it and can file an opposition against the registration of a subsequent user. Further, the Act extends robust protection to “well-known trademarks” and permits its owner to oppose registration of identical/similar mark even for unrelated goods or services in case the new mark is likely to get an unfair advantage of or is likely to cause detriment to the reputation of the well-known mark.

Bad Faith or Dishonest Filing

An application for Trademark Registration can be opposed on the ground that it was filed in bad faith. This happens when an applicant applies for a mark with dishonest intentions, such as to imitate a popular brand, exclude a competitor from entering the market, or misappropriate another trader's goodwill. Proving bad faith is a powerful ground for a Trademark Opposition as it will undermine the legitimacy of the application.